Sign in to follow this
Followers
0
Redfield BattleZone TAC.22 - Anyone have any experience?
By
Tack Tickle, in Optics & Accessories
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Latest Topics
-
-
-
Similar Content
-
By Maksim
Letting the inner Slav continue to come out. Second video will launch today at 3PM Eastern.
To help grow the Slavness, have a few companies helping out with giveaways.
Subscribe if you have not done so yet, like the video and share it with your friends, hashtag #slavguns.
One person will be selected at the premier and another over the next 24 hours after launch! A very cool AR-15 accessory and some stuff from previous Shot Shows.
-
By AlexTheSane
Has anyone used the Beretta U22 Neos? What do you think?
I've been a member of OBRPC for about a year now and have only participated in clay shooting.
I'm thinking of now participating in things like OBRAMS and Speed on Steel.
I would like to get a 22 handgun. I've seen a lot of rave reviews about the Ruger MKIII but I'm not sure if I want to spend that much money right now.
If I buy a sub $400 gun right now, will I just want a Ruger down the road?
Will something like the U22 or any other 22 handgun suffice for 2 years?
Ok, I'm babbling now. I just got home from work and need to go to bed. I look forward to reading everyone's opinions when I wake up.
-
-
Posts
-
This mindset baffles me. Shooting is a depreciating skill. If you don't practice, you will become worse at it. If you value your life enough to want to defend it, why would you rely on a skill that you don't practice? If the best I can do on a good day is scrape a pass on CCARE, I would be determined to get better at shooting - and yes I did see that you scored 98% - but your attitude appears to be that you shouldn't have to practice first. Trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you mean that the government should not mandate that you have to meet any kind of standard before you can carry. I agree. There should not be any mandated quals. However, only a fool would be carrying a gun he can't use effectively. It does little to protect himself and creates a danger to everyone else because the misses will go on to hit something or someone after they miss the intended target. -
OK let me explain. If you use your 9MM to qualify you will probably need to practice before you qualify so you go through 125 rds of ammo. Using expensive 9mm ammunition that's probably close to $0.40 around is costly. If you used your .22 LR pistol the price drops to less than 10 cents a round. I easily qualified with my Glock 226 ( 1 miss out of 50) but burned up a lot of ammo practicing. We should not be required to qualify to exercise a constitutional right and it should not cost a few hundred dollars to do so. -
Up for sale a Nikon Monarch 1.5-4.5X20 Riflescope. Scope formerly sat on top of my old Mini 14, so it is used. It also has some aftermarket lens covers on them (Buffalo Creek I believe). I'm asking $100 for the scope. Willing to drive within an hour of Woodbridge or meet half way. Buyer pays any shipping costs. First to post "I'll take it" wins the scope. -
-
In 50 years of living in NJ I've never experienced any attempt to inspect the interior of the home, and only one definite inspection of the exterior for an announced reassessment of all properties and that was a drive by. About 9 years of that was living in an apartment, but still, uncommon. Every place I lived had either a finished attic, basement, or both. But they were also included in the habitable square footage on the taxes when we got there.
-
-
