thelosticon 0 Posted January 20, 2015 Any issues with taking delivery of an empty 30 round mag body? Its not a parts kit, no spring, no follower or baseplate, just the body itself. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Malsua 1,422 Posted January 20, 2015 In a sane world, it's a box. In NJ, it's a baby killing machine. If you want to spin the revolver cylinder with one round in it, place it against your temple and pull the trigger, understand that actions have consequences. I don't believe you will get ANYONE telling you that it is ok to have magazine parts in your possession that can hold greater than 15 rounds in them, even if those parts don't work. The chance of anyone finding out, prosecuting you and winning is low, but it is not zero. I can't see any reason why such a risk would be worth it. Send it to a friend in PA and eliminate your risk altogether. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remixer 1,645 Posted January 20, 2015 Personally. i would think IN nj it would be an issue to even own the empty mag body. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blacksmythe 71 Posted January 20, 2015 Probrobly. I hate this place. Save yourself the aggravation. Get the Hex Mags from Remixer. 30 round body with NJ and CO approved round count. I have 12 and counting. Next 12 will be in OD. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RUTGERS95 890 Posted January 20, 2015 constructive intent NO Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boo 6 Posted January 20, 2015 I think it's fine. How can it be constructive intent if he doesn't have the parts to assemble a full magazine? Otherwise, everyone in possession of a full auto BCG would be facing charges. But if it turns out I'm wrong, I'll happily contribute a few bucks to OP's legal fees. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MartyZ 692 Posted January 20, 2015 Probrobly. I hate this place. Save yourself the aggravation. Get the Hex Mags from Remixer. 30 round body with NJ and CO approved round count. I have 12 and counting. Next 12 will be in OD. So when you are cleaning the hexmags and disassemble them, don't you now technically have a 30 round body? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blacksmythe 71 Posted January 21, 2015 So when you are cleaning the hexmags and disassemble them, don't you now technically have a 30 round body? The body is molded internally differently from their 30 rounders so no. Its on their website. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
checko 180 Posted January 21, 2015 I think it's fine. How can it be constructive intent if he doesn't have the parts to assemble a full magazine? Otherwise, everyone in possession of a full auto BCG would be facing charges. But if it turns out I'm wrong, I'll happily contribute a few bucks to OP's legal fees. I agree. Dont see how it's a magazine if it can't hold ANY rounds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladtepes 1,060 Posted January 21, 2015 If you have JUST the mag body.. And lack the parts to make it work... Then IMO you do not have a large capacity magazine as the law describes.. The standard for a large capacity mag indicates a working mag.. As it must be able to continuously feed more than 15 rounds.. A mag body can not do that.. Now people may say if that is true why cant you have a complete parts kit.. Disassembled mag... The opinion letter stating that a mag that is not permanently modified is still a large cap mag.. This IMO shows the intention of the state to disallow large capacity mags even in parts form.. As that is a temporary condition.. BUT when you get into JUST a mag body.. At that point it is NOT a mag... Now if you have a mag body and the rest of the parts... Illegal imo because that would be a complete large cap mag that is temporarily unable to function as a large cap mag.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papercutninja 24 Posted January 21, 2015 It's just a magazine body. It's like saying a pile of belt-fed links (not connected) is illegal. If he had the spring and follower, then I would say it's a no-no. But just a magazine body can't be considered a magazine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PD2K 115 Posted January 21, 2015 I wouldn't take the chance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyB 4,325 Posted January 21, 2015 If you do not have the parts in your possession to complete the assembly, there can be no constructive intent! This issue was brought up here many times. The state did not want large normal capacity mags to be disassembled and it's components kept to avoid the law so they said if you have the parts to assemble a working normal cap mag there was indeed intent which is the same crime as getting caught with a fully operational magazine. How can you construct a magazine with only one part! Where it gets tricky, and you can get into trouble is if you have the body and spring for a hi cap mag but no other parts you are still good. If you own a 10 round mag with a follower and base plate that could fit in and complete the hi cap mag. You are now in possession of all the parts and that's illegal. You must consider if in your entire collection of magazines, there are the parts that could complete that box, that is intent. I suppose if you could tie 2 x 15 round springs together and easily make the 30 rounder work. That may also be intent. If they want to get you, they probably can so I would think about it! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites