Strike Industries J-Comp muzzle device - NJ legal?

[DirtyDigz 1,812]

It's listed as a "compensator", but the description also says "The front vents act to minimize flash".   Is any mention of flash-suppression capability verboten in NJ?

 

http://www.primaryarms.com/si-jcomp-01/p/si-jcomp-01/

 

 

 

The Strike Industries J-Comp is based on the Japanese Type 89 assault rifle used by the Japanese Self-Defense Forces and perfectly accommodates those who want a unique looking and highly effective compensator on their rifle. The double chamber system greatly reduces recoil and redirects concussive blast with the help of six ported vents. The front vents act to minimize flash, allowing you to not just stay on target, but to keep it in sight as well! Crush Washer not included.

 

 

[bhunted 887]

Yes, won't pass pinky test either.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Krdshrk 3,877]

Yes, won't pass pinky test either.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

That's not a legit test.

[bhunted 887]

That's not a legit test.

Tell the staties that.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Krdshrk 3,877]

Tell the staties that.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Have 'em cite the actual statute that says "pinky"

[Krdshrk 3,877]

The manufacturer's website also does say minimizing flash, so I would not trust it.

http://www.strikeindustries.com/shop/index.php/products/rifle-accessories/ar/muzzle-device/comps/japan-type89-comp.html#.Vj6nh7fntaQ

[bhunted 887]

Have 'em cite the actual statute that says "pinky"

They don't have to unless you press the issue. They do it the way they want. But in any event. Chance in court if you have the time, money and gumption... The descript and look makes it a no go in my book. Not worth any hassles.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[PK90 3,570]

Make Way.

 

The NJSP are never wrong.

[tattooo 220]

That wont even pass the index finger test.....lol

[JT Custom Guns 957]

The first chamber has a baffle so it is a Break, and the "pinky" test does not apply

to this type of muzzle device. It is clearly chambered with a baffle.

 

As for the "minimizes flash" - it doesn't state it hides flash, and the state statue says

nothing about reducing flash (just hiding it) so I wouldn't be afraid to use one...........

 

jmo

[DSD1026 48]

What kind of different description does this give than say, the BCM Mod 0, which a number of people on this site have attached?

[PK90 3,570]

The first chamber has a baffle so it is a Break, and the "pinky" test does not apply

to this type of muzzle device. It is clearly chambered with a baffle.

 

As for the "minimizes flash" - it doesn't state it hides flash, and the state statue says

nothing about reducing flash (just hiding it) so I wouldn't be afraid to use one...........

 

jmo

 

You have it backwards. The statutes never mention "hide". It is "suppress".

"flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor"

You don't know "Jack". Pun intended.

[bhunted 887]

One way or another, there are many breaks on the market that are similar, legal and work fine. In my humble opinion, unless you are going full auto, most breaks do a minimal job and are nothing more than aesthetics. It's not like .223 has much of a kick or rise in semi mode on an AR platform. But again, thats just my opinion.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[PK90 3,570]

Break

 

BRAKE

[bhunted 887]

Break

 

BRAKE

Lol... Damn auto guess... I usually correct it. Missed that one. Lol...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk